lite judisk historia

[turtle]

1. King bulan


Lite jag hittat på ifers. Inte mina ord men tycker det är Rätt intressant, jag är absolut ingen expert och vet inte mycket om historia eller religion, så tänkte se om alla "debunkers" där ute kan rätta det eller om det stämmer.

http://ifers.123.st/t53-jews-are-not-a-race-they-re-khazars



Israel – A Nation Founded Upon a Monumental Lie

Once upon a time, hundreds of years ago, there was an extraordinarily evil kingdom. A land ruled by a wicked king who filled his court with practitioners of ancient Babylonian black arts, and occult oligarchs. A land inhabited by an aggressive demented race of thieves, murderers, and highwaymen, who would prey on travellers, steal from them, murder them, and then assume their identity. The citizens of neighbouring lands lived in constant fear and trepidation of this menacing realm, its criminal population, and its warlike tendencies.

Anyone could be forgiven for thinking that the above opening is the prologue to a mythical fable from times past, but such a sinister country, complete with its equally terrorizing inhabitants did exist. The country was called Khazaria, and its populace Khazars. A land to the north of Georgia and the south of Bulgaria, between the Black and Caspian seas.

The history of the Khazars, has been almost completely excised from history books and public records, and many hours of intense research were required to reconstruct this purposely hidden secret history of the Khazars. The following is the true history of Khazaria, its evolution, and its present day influences on our society.

The Khazars originally were an Asiatic Mongoloid nation. From time immemorial the homeland of the Khazars was in the heart of Asia. It was a very hostile nation, constantly at war with its neighbours. The Khazars were finally driven out of Asia by neighbouring countries in Asia with whom they were continually at war. The Khazars fled their Asian homeland and invaded eastern Europe to escape further defeats in Asia.

The very hostile Khazars did not find it difficult to subdue and conquer the 25 peaceful agricultural nations occupying approximately 1,000,000 square miles in eastern Europe. In a comparatively short period the Khazars established the largest and most powerful kingdom in Europe, and probably the wealthiest also.

Between 100 and 800AD an incredibly evil society evolved in Khazaria. During this time, Khazars become known to surrounding countries as thieves, murderers, road bandits, and for assuming the identities of those travellers they murdered as a normal occupational practice and way of life.

The Khazars were a pagan nation when they invaded eastern Europe. Their historical religious doctrines were a mixture of phallic worship and other forms of idolatrous reverence practiced in Asia by several pagan nations. The vile forms of sexual excess indulged in by the Khazars as their form of religious worship degenerated into a degree of debauched moral decadence unparalleled by any other nation of the time. This form of decadent worship continued until the 7th century until it could no longer be endured by the Khazarian king of the time.

King Bulan, ruler at that time of the Khazarian Kingdom, decided to abolish the practice of phallic worship and other forms of idolatrous worship and make one of the three monotheistic religions, about which he knew very little, the new state religion. After a documented historic session with representatives of the three monotheistic religions King Bulan eventually decided against Christianity and Islam and selected Judaism as the future state religion of the Khazarian nation. It was decreed that every man woman and child of Khazaria must convert to Judaism and practice its philosophy.

 

[turtle]

2. King bulan


King Bulan and his 4000 feudal nobles were promptly converted by rabbis imported from Babylonia specifically for that event. Phallic worship and other forms of idolatry were thereafter forbidden. The Khazarian king then invited large numbers of rabbis to come and open synagogues and schools to instruct the population in the new form of religious worship. It was now the state religion. The converted Khazars were the first population of so-called or self-styled “Jews’ in eastern Europe.

After the conversion of King Bulan none other than a so-called or self-styled “Jew” could occupy the Khazar throne. The Khazar Kingdom became a virtual theocracy. The religious leaders were the civil administrators also. The religious leaders imposed the teachings of the Talmud upon the population as their guide to living. The ideologies of the Talmud became the axis of political, cultural, economic and social attitudes and activities throughout the Khazar kingdom. The Talmud provided both civil and religious law.

Despite this mass conversion by the king and his subjects there remained a select secret circle of oligarchs who continued practicing ancient Babylonian black magic, also known as Secret Satanism. This Secret Satanism involved occult ceremonies featuring child sacrifice, after “bleeding them out”, drinking their blood and eating their hearts.

The deep dark secret of those occult practices was that they were all based on ancient Baal Worship, also known as worship of the Owl. In order to deceive the Khazarian king this clandestine group melded these Luciferian black magic practices with Judaism and created a secret Satanic-hybrid religion, known as Babylonian Talmudism. This occult form of Judaism was surreptitiously practiced in Khazaria, and it nurtured the same evil that Khazaria was known for previously.

During the 10th, 11th, 12th, and 13th centuries the rapidly expanding new Russian empire gradually swallowed up the Khazar kingdom, its neighbour directly to the south. The conquest of the Khazar Kingdom by the Russians provides history with the explanation for the presence after the 13th century, of the large number of so-called “Jews” in Russia. This huge number of self-styled “Jews”, both in Russia and in many other eastern European nations after the destruction of the Khazar Kingdom, were thereafter no longer known as Khazars but as the “Yiddish” populations of these many countries. The term Yiddish is taken directly from the spoken and written language of the Khazarian “Jews”.

When the Khazars in the 1st century B.C. invaded eastern Europe their mother-tongue was an ancient Asiatic language. They spoke primitive Asiatic dialects without any alphabet or written form. When King Bulan was converted in the 7th century he decreed that the Hebrew characters he saw in the Talmud and other Hebrew documents was thereafter to become the official alphabet of the Khazar language. The Hebrew characters were adapted to the phonetics of the spoken Khazar language. The Khazars employed the characters of the ancient Hebrew language in order to provide a means of accomplishing a written account of their spoken words.

It is interesting to note that although the Yiddish and ancient Hebrew languages share the exact same characters in their alphabets, “Yiddish” must not be confused with “Hebrew”. There is not a single word of Yiddish in ancient Hebrew nor is there one word of ancient “Hebrew” in “Yiddish”. They are as totally different as spoken and written Swedish and Spanish, yet which both likewise share the same Latin based characters for their alphabets.

 

[turtle]

3. King bulan


Whilst many textbooks and web-pages will attempt to assert that modern Hebrew and Yiddish both have roots in ancient biblical Hebrew, this claim can easily be debunked by both historians and linguists. The real reason that modern Hebrew has some similarities to Yiddish is because the inventors of modern Hebrew although attempting to revive and modernise ancient biblical Hebrew, couldn’t completely eradicate their Yiddish linguistic roots.

In the many wars with her neighbours in Europe since the 13th century, Russia was required to cede to her victors large areas which were originally part of the Khazar Kingdom. In this manner Poland, Lithuania, Galicia, Hungary, Rumania, and Austria were acquired from Russian territory which was originally a part of the Khazar Kingdom. Together with this territory these nations acquired a segment of the population of so-called or self-styled “Jews” descended from the Khazars who once occupied the territory. These frequent boundary changes by the nations in eastern Europe explains the presence today of many Jews in all of these countries, all whose ancestry can be traced back to the converted Khazars. Their common language, their common culture, their common religion, and their common racial characteristics classify them all beyond any question of doubt with the Khazars who invaded eastern Europe in the 1st century B.C. and who were converted to Judaism in the 7th century.

These so-called “Jews” of eastern European origin make up at least 90% of the world’s present total population of Jews. Judaism was given the greatest stimulus in all its history with the conversion of the large pagan Khazar population in the 7th century. Without the conversion of the Khazar population it is doubtful if Judaism could have survived. It would have disappeared with all of its contemporary creeds and cults but for the conversion of the Khazars in the 7th century. At that time Judaism was well on its way towards complete oblivion, but the conversion of the Khazarian empire gave it a new lease of life.

From the 13th to the beginning of the 20th century Khazarian Jews spread to the four corners of the globe, integrating into communities worldwide, having nowhere they could call their homeland. Khazaria no longer existed and Judea, the original homeland of the biblical Jews was long gone, following their expulsion from their native soil by the Romans some 2000 years previous. During this period Khazarian Jews either lost or abandoned their true heritage, instead preferring to falsely believe that they were actually native Jews of biblical origin who descended from Israelite–Canaanite tribes who left the Holy Land for Europe in the seventh century, following the Muslim conquest of Palestine. . They came to be known as Ashkenazi Jews.

Although Ashkenazi Jews are professed to be of Germanic/European origin, and descendants of native biblical Jews, there is very little evidence in support of this claim. In fact recent DNA analysis has concluded that Ashkenazi Jews are genetically descended from the Khazars.

 

[turtle]

4. King bulan


In the late 19th century came the advent of the Zionist movement in Europe. Zionism is a political movement amongst Jews (although supported by many non Jews), which maintains that the Jewish people constitute a nation and are entitled to a national homeland. Formally founded in 1897, Zionism embraced a variety of opinions in its early years on where that homeland might be established. From 1917 it focused on the establishment of a Jewish national homeland or state in Palestine, the original location of the ancient Kingdom of Israel/Judea. However, even the claim that Palestine is the native home of the Jewish people is not totally supported by fact.

According to the bible, this land was first inhabited by Canaanites, known to be the descendents of Noah. The Nation of Israel appeared on this land centuries later when they were brought out of the land of Egypt. They remained here for a few centuries until their exile by Assyrians and then by Babylonians. Finding favour with the Persians, they returned to this land, only to be swept away once again by Romans and Greeks.

The principles of the Zionist movement began to permeate throughout Ashkenazi/Khazarian Jewish communities worldwide and many became enthralled by the notion of returning to their alleged historical, biblical homeland, even though in reality it was not.

Then, on 2nd November 1917 came the Balfour Declaration. The Balfour Declaration was a formal statement of policy by the British government stating that:

“His Majesty’s government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.”

On 14th May 1948 the Balfour Declaration was realised and the modern state of Israel was founded.



Ashkenazi Jews flocked to their new found homeland in droves and rapidly expanded their borders beyond their intended limits. Since the inception of the state of Israel in 1948, and especially since 1967, Israel has relentlessly, brutally, and uncompromisingly expanded their borders into Palestinian land. These Jewish usurpers have seized land, stolen farms, and demolished Palestinian homes with unrelenting ruthlessness and unforgiving vindictiveness. They have reduced the Palestinian nation to nothing more than the wretched, pitiful strip of dessert – the Gaza strip, effectively making the Palestinians prisoners in their own land, and they will stop at nothing until they have either removed or annihilated all Palestinians.

These usurpers believe they have a right to this land as they are Gods chosen people. They profess to be of the lineage of Abraham so therefore have an ancestral entitlement to displace its present inhabitants, and replace them with their own. They claim the ancient land of Canaan (now Palestine) as their legacy because they are descendents of the 12 tribes. This is their God given birthright, based upon their ancestry.

Yet this is a monumental lie.

90% of the inhabitants of modern day Israel are not descendents of Abraham, or any other biblical predecessor. In fact they have next to no middle eastern blood in their veins. Ashkenazi Jews have no hereditary right whatsoever to the land they now inhabit. They have stolen this territory from its rightful inhabitants and are now obliterating them, just as the Khazars obliterated the former populace of Khazaria when they invaded from Asia.

They may have changed their religion in years gone by, but their decadent bloodthirsty conquests have remained!

 

[turtle]

5. King bulan


References

The Jewish Encyclopaedia:

“Khazars, a non-Semitic, Asiatic, Mongolian tribal nation who emigrated into Eastern Europe about the first century, who were converted as an entire nation to Judaism in the seventh century by the expanding Russian nation which absorbed the entire Khazar population, and who account for the presence in Eastern Europe of the great numbers of Yiddish-speaking Jews in Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Galatia, Besserabia and Rumania.”

The Universal Jewish Encyclopaedia:

“The primary meaning of Ashkenaz and Ashkenazim in Hebrew is Germany and Germans. This may be due to the fact that the home of the ancient ancestors of the Germans is Media, which is the Biblical Ashkenaz… in the early medieval ages the Khazars were sometimes referred to as Ashkenazim… About 92 percent of all Jews or approximately 14,500,000 are Ashkenazim.”

Encyclopaedia Americana:

“Ashkenazim, the Ashkenazim are the Jews whose ancestors lived in German lands…it was among Ashkenazi Jews that the idea of political Zionism emerged, leading ultimately to the establishment of the state of Israel… In the late 1960s, Ashkenazi Jews numbered some 11 million, about 84 percent of the world Jewish population.”

The American Peoples Encyclopaedia:

“In the year 740 A.D. the Khazars were officially converted to Judaism. A century later they were crushed by the incoming Slavic-speaking people and were scattered over central Europe where they were known as Jews.

The New Encyclopaedia Britannica, Volume 6:

“Khazar, member of a confederation of Turkic-speaking tribes that in the late 6th century A.D. established a major commercial empire covering the south-eastern section of modern European Russia…but the most striking characteristic of the Khazars was the adoption of Judaism by the Kagan and the greater part of the ruling class in about 740…The fact itself, however, is undisputed and unparalleled in the history of Central Eurasia. A few scholars have ascertained that the Judaized Khazars were the remote ancestors of many of the Jews of Eastern Europe and Russia.“ -Graham Pick

 

[turtle]

6. Khazars, from Khazaria


"The undeniable evidence of this has become clear with the advent of DNA research. In 2001, Dr. Ariella Oppenheim and her team at Tel Aviv University released their study which found that the “Jews” were mainly Khazars, from Khazaria, a Caucasus country which is now called Kazakhstan, Georgia, and other names. The Khazarians converted from pagan religions to talmudic Judaism after the 8th century, but of course, racially they remain Khazars."
-Texe Marrs

"The Khazar conversion is no revelation. It was the basis for a 1976 book by Arthur Koestler, The Thirteenth Tribe, which was reviled, then ignored, by mainstream Zionism. But the Jewish Khazars were recognised by early Zionist historians, albeit as a numerically insignificant curiosity. They were only dropped from the story in the 1960s. After the 1967 Six Day War, to be precise. Sand notes that the disappearance of converts from Israeli history books coincides with increased occupation of Arab land. This is not a conspiracy theory."
-The Guardian

A well-known Jewish author, Arthur Koestler has published a 255 page book titled THE THIRTEENTH TRIBE in which he proves the point; that Eastern European "Jews" are neither Israelites nor "Semites," but are instead Khazars. Most major newspapers and magazines reviewed the book during 1976. Also, Random House, the publisher, advertised it extensively and began some of their ads with the following headline: WHAT IF MOST JEWS AREN'T REALLY SEMITES AT ALL? In addition, Random House quoted the following reviews:

"Mr. Koestler's excellent book...Is as readable as it is thought-provoking. Nothing could be more stimulating than the skill, elegance and erudition with which he marshals his facts and develops his theories..." Fitzroy Maclean, New York Times Book Review

"You do not have to be Jewish to be interested... Are today's Western Jews really ethnic, Semitic, Biblical Jews, or are most of them descendants of converted Khazars?...This compact, interesting book...examines tragic-ironic implications in [this question] for modern history...It should fascinate." --Edmund Fuller, Wall Street Journal

"Koestler marshals the evidence in a clear and convincing way. He tells a good story, pulling together materials from medieval Muslims and Jewish travelers, scholarly controversy and the mysterious lore of the Khazars." --Raymond Sokolov, Newsweek

Robert Kirsch of the Los Angeles Times stated in his lengthy review that 'Arthur Koestler publicizes with his customary skills a daring hypothesis: that THE KHAZAR JEWS MIGRATED TO POLAND AND BECAME THE FOREBEARS OF EASTERN EUROPEAN JEWRY...'

Then Kirsch quoted Prof. A. N. Poliak of Tel Aviv University, who stated that "The large majority of world Jewry is descended from the Jews of Khazaria." Then he again quoted Koestler in THE THIRTEENTH TRIBE, "If so, this would mean that their ancestors came not from the Jordan but from the Volga; not from Canaan but from the Caucasus, once believed to be the cradle of the Aryan race; and that GENETICALLY THEY ARE MORE RELATED TO THE HUN, UIGUR, AND MAGYAR TRIBES THAN TO THE SEED OF ABRAHAM, ISAAC, AND JACOB..."

In 1951 retired U.S. Military Intelligence Officer, Col. John Beaty, published a scholarly 265-page book IRON CURTAIN OVER AMERICA. In it Col. Beaty gave overwhelming evidence that this Race of Eastern European "Jews" were actually Khazar and Mongol Asiatics and had no racial ancestory in Israel at all.
-biblebelievers

 

[turtle]

7. Khazars, from Khazaria.


The Jews admit that they are not the descendants of the Ancient Israelites in their writings.
Under the heading of "A brief History of the Terms for Jew" in the 1980 Jewish Almanac is the following:

"Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew."
(1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3).

Encyclopedia Americana (1985):

"Khazar, an ancient Turkic speaking people who ruled a large and powerful state in the steppes North of the Caucasus Mountains from the 7th century to their demise in the mid 11th century A.D... In the 8th Century it's political and religious head... as well as the greater part of the Khazar nobility, abandoned paganism and converted to Judaism... (The Khazars are believed to be the ancestors of most Russian and Eastern European Jews)."

Encyclopedia Britannica (15th edition):

"Khazars, confederation of Turkic and Iranian tribes that established a major commercial empire in the second half of the 6th century, covering the southeastern section of modern European Russia... In the middle of the 8th century the ruling classes adopted Judaism as their religion."

The Jewish Encyclopedia:

"Khazars, a non-Semitic, Asiatic, Mongolian tribal nation who emigrated into Eastern Europe about the first century, who were converted as an entire nation to Judaism in the seventh century by the expanding Russian nation which absorbed the entire Khazar population, and who account for the presence in Eastern Europe of the great numbers of Yiddish-speaking Jews in Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Galatia, Besserabia and Rumania."

The Encyclopedia Judaica (1972):

"Khazars, a national group of general Turkic type, independent and sovereign in Eastern Europe between the seventh and tenth centuries C.E. During part of this time the leading Khazars professed Judaism... In spite of the negligible information of an archaeological nature, the presence of Jewish groups and the impact of Jewish ideas in Eastern Europe are considerable during the Middle Ages. Groups have been mentioned as migrating to Central Europe from the East often have been referred to as Khazars, thus making it impossible to overlook the possibility that they originated from within the former Khazar Empire."

The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia:

"The primary meaning of Ashkenaz and Ashkenazim in Hebrew is Germany and Germans. This may be due to the fact that the home of the ancient ancestors of the Germans is Media, which is the Biblical Ashkenaz... Krauss is of the opinion that in the early medieval ages the Khazars were sometimes referred to as Ashkenazim... About 92 percent of all Jews or approximately 14,500,000 are Ashkenazim."

The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia:

"Khazars, a medieval people, probably related to the Volga Bulgars, whose ruling class adopted Judaism during the 8th cent. The Khazars seem to have emerged during the 6th cent., from the vast nomadic Hun (Turki) empire which stretched from the steppes of Eastern Europe and the Volga basin to the Chinese frontier. Although it is often claimed that allusions to the Khazars are found as early as 200 C.E., actually they are not mentioned until 627...Most Jewish Historians date the conversion of the Khazar King to Judaism during the first half of this century {A.D.}..."

Academic American Encyclopedia, Deluxe Library Edition, Volume 12, page 66 states:

"The Khazars, a Turkic people, created a commercial and political empire that dominated substantial parts of South Russia during much of the 7th through 10th centuries. during the 8th century the Khazar aristocracy and the Kagan (King) were converted to Judaism."


http://www.iamthewitness.com/doc/Ashkenazis.are.not.the.descendants.of.the.Ancient.Israelites.htm

 

[turtle]

Har 10 poster kvar om "Jewish Ritual Sacrifice", vi får se om jag lägger upp dom sen med, blir inte gulligare direkt. Om det stämmer vilket jag har svårt att se att det inte gör, kan man förstå att dom blivit bannade gång på gång från olika länder i historian.

 

[L-I-P]

2. King bulan


King Bulan and his 4000 feudal nobles were promptly converted by rabbis imported from Babylonia specifically for that event. Phallic worship and other forms of idolatry were thereafter forbidden. The Khazarian king then invited large numbers of rabbis to come and open synagogues and schools to instruct the population in the new form of religious worship. It was now the state religion. The converted Khazars were the first population of so-called or self-styled “Jews’ in eastern Europe.

After the conversion of King Bulan none other than a so-called or self-styled “Jew” could occupy the Khazar throne. The Khazar Kingdom became a virtual theocracy. The religious leaders were the civil administrators also. The religious leaders imposed the teachings of the Talmud upon the population as their guide to living. The ideologies of the Talmud became the axis of political, cultural, economic and social attitudes and activities throughout the Khazar kingdom. The Talmud provided both civil and religious law.

Despite this mass conversion by the king and his subjects there remained a select secret circle of oligarchs who continued practicing ancient Babylonian black magic, also known as Secret Satanism. This Secret Satanism involved occult ceremonies featuring child sacrifice, after “bleeding them out”, drinking their blood and eating their hearts.

The deep dark secret of those occult practices was that they were all based on ancient Baal Worship, also known as worship of the Owl. In order to deceive the Khazarian king this clandestine group melded these Luciferian black magic practices with Judaism and created a secret Satanic-hybrid religion, known as Babylonian Talmudism. This occult form of Judaism was surreptitiously practiced in Khazaria, and it nurtured the same evil that Khazaria was known for previously.

Inte så mycket för att debunka utan snarare att vissa saker är väldigt luddiga. Kommer dela upp svaren på ett visst sätt för att få vettig struktur.

Termen "hemlig satanism" är nästan missvisande och känns mest vald för att chockera.
I princip så handlar det om att några personer i hemlighet och mot kungens vilja utövade sin pre-judiska religion (jmfr. med att en tidig svensk satanist jämstälde att bli riden av rået med att dyrka satan.). På samma grunder så borde utövande av asatro vara sataniskt eller ja det finns ju asatroende som är satanist-nazister.

Att man blandade in judiska element för att undgå upptäckt är inget unikt. Finns flera olika exempel runt om i världen där man av olika orsaker blandar religioner.
Man kan även se Balder efter ragnarök som djupt influerad av kristen symbolik.

Jag blir alltid förvånad när folk försöker koppla ihop ugglan som något exlusivt för Baal-dyrkan.
I grekiska religion så förknippas Ugglan med Minerva. I Japan har ugglor flera betydelser.

 

[turtle]

Jaja här kommer mera, ska bara va väldigt tydlig med att jag inte vet om det stämmer, det bör ses som en fråga snarare än ett påstående, jag undrar bara hur mycket som stämmer eller inte stämmer.

 

[turtle]

9. Jewish Ritual Sacrifice (circumcision)



Til this day nothing change .Artical from jewish newspaper Haaretz.
www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/1.644113

NYC, ultra-Orthodox reach deal on circumcision suction ritual



The city said Tuesday it has reached a tentative agreement with members of the ultra-Orthodox Jewish community over a tradition known as oral suction circumcision, or metzitzah b’peh.

Health officials have linked 17 cases of infant herpes since 2000 to the ancient ritual of sucking blood from the wounds on the infants' penises.

On Tuesday, Mayor Bill de Blasio's administration said mohels, as the circumcisers are called in Yiddish, should no longer be required to obtain signed consent forms before the rites.

Administration officials said they will ask the Board of Health to vote to rescind the requirement while working with a coalition of rabbinical leaders and medical experts to educate members of the ultra-Orthodox community about the possible dangers of the practice, known as metzitzah b'peh in Hebrew. A vote is expected in June.

If an infant is found to have herpes after a circumcision, officials will ask a rabbinical coalition to identify the mohel who performed it so his DNA can be tested. If he's found to have infected the infant, he'll be banned from performing the ritual.

Oral suction circumcisions first came under scrutiny in 2012 during Mayor Michael Bloomberg's administration, which asked parents or guardians to sign consent forms indicating they understood the medical risks.

But the city's mohels, believed to perform more than 3,000 rites annually, say they apply strict medical procedures, including testing for herpes, sterilizing their hands and rinsing with mouthwash before the ceremony.

Rabbi A. Romi Cohn, who has performed 35,000 circumcisions, said he believes babies could have contracted the herpes virus from sources other than mohels.

Officials said Tuesday that DNA testing by health officials likely would prove or disprove whether there's a match between an infected infant and a mohel. If not and a baby still tests positive, health officials will try to seek the source of the herpes, which often results in skin blisters.

Officials said the new agreement fulfills the mayor's commitment to find a more effective policy that protects children and religious rights.

Details of the agreement haven't been finalized, but officials concede it's impossible to enforce the proposed measures in a community that practices its religious freedom in private.

Mohels have produced only one signed consent form in recent years, and rabbis urged their faithful not to comply.

 

[turtle]

10. Jewish Ritual Sacrifice (circumcision)


Posted on www.circumcision.org

Mothers Who Observed Circumcision

“I didn’t know how horrific it was going to be.”

“The screams of my baby remain embedded in my bones and haunt my mind.”

The typical hospital circumcision is done out of view of the mother in a separate room. However, a few are observed by parents, and many Jewish ritual circumcisions are done in the homes of the parents and observed by family and friends. Although some parents may report that this is a positive experience, this is not always the case. According to research, women are more likely than men to report distress from hearing an infant crying. Regarding circumcision, the father is more likely to deny his son’s pain because it could remind him of his own circumcision feelings. Therefore, witnessing the circumcision and the infant’s response can have a particularly shocking effect on the mother. Only recently have some parents been willing to describe their agonizingly painful experiences at their son’s circumcision. Though further research is needed to tell us how common these responses are, the fact that they exist at all is reason for concern and reflection.

Some mothers have written about their experiences with circumcision during the previous year. “It was as close to hell as I ever want to get!” one wrote. Another related this memory:

My tiny son and I sobbed our hearts out. . . . After everything I’d worked for, carrying and nurturing Joseph in the womb, having him at home against no small odds, keeping him by my side constantly since birth, nursing him whenever he needed closeness and nourishment—the circumcision was a horrible violation of all I felt we shared. I cried for days afterward.

Melissa Morrison was having a difficult time seven months after she had watched the (nonritual) circumcision of her son:

I’m finding myself obsessing more and more about it. It’s absolutely horrible. I didn’t know how horrific it was going to be. It was the most gruesome thing I have ever seen in my life. I told the doctor as soon as he was done, if I had a gun I would have killed him. I swear I would be in jail today if I did have a gun.

Two other mothers have reported to the Circumcision Resource Center that watching their son’s circumcision was “the worst day of my life.”

Another mother noted that she still felt pain recalling the experience about a year later. She wrote to her son:

I have never heard such screams. . . . Will I ever know what scars this brings to your soul? . . . What is that new look I see in your eyes? I can see pain, a certain sadness, and a loss of trust.

Other mothers clearly remember their son’s circumcision after many years. Miriam Pollack reported fifteen years after the event:

“The screams of my baby remain embedded in my bones and haunt my mind.” She added later, “His cry sounded like he was being butchered. I lost my milk.”

Nancy Wainer Cohen recalled her feelings connected with the circumcision of her son, who is now twenty-two:

I heard him cry during the time they were circumcising him. The thing that is most disturbing to me is that I can still hear his cry. . . . It was an assault on him, and on some level it was an assault on me. . . . I will go to my grave hearing that horrible wail, and feeling somewhat responsible, feeling that it was my lack of awareness, my lack of consciousness. I did the best I could, and it wasn’t good enough.

 

[turtle]

11. Jewish Ritual Sacrifice (circumcision)


Elizabeth Pickard-Ginsburg vividly remembered her son’s circumcision and its effect on her:

Jesse was shrieking and I had tears streaming down my face. . . . He was screaming and there was no doubt in his scream that he wanted mother, or a mothering figure to come and protect him from this pain!! . . . Jesse screamed so loud that all of a sudden there was no sound! I’ve never heard anything like it!! He was screaming and it went up and then there was no sound and his mouth was just open and his face was full of pain!! I remember something happened inside me . . . the intensity of it was like blowing a fuse! It was too much. We knew something was over. I don’t feel that it ever really healed. . . . I don’t think I can recover from it. It’s a scar. I’ve put a lot of energy into trying to recover. I did some crying and we did some therapy. There’s still a lot of feeling that’s blocked off. It was too intense. . . . We had this beautiful baby boy and seven beautiful days and this beautiful rhythm starting, and it was like something had been shattered!! . . . When he was first born there was a tie with my young one, my newborn. And when the circumcision happened, in order to allow it I had cut off the bond. I had to cut off my natural instincts, and in doing so I cut off a lot of feelings towards Jesse. I cut it off to repress the pain and to repress the natural instinct to stop the circumcision.

After several years, Pickard-Ginsburg says she can still feel “an element of detachment” toward her son. Her account is particularly revealing. That she “cut off” feelings toward her son by observing his circumcision suggests that her son may have responded similarly toward her by experiencing his circumcision. Furthermore, because she was willing to feel and communicate the intensity of her pain, we have a clue to why more mothers who observe their son’s circumcision do not report such pain. Denial and repression may keep this extreme pain out of their awareness.

Observing their son’s circumcision has left some parents with a deep feeling of regret. The following quotes are typical:

I am so sorry I was so ignorant about circumcision. Had I witnessed a circumcision first, I never would have consented to having my son circumcised. Always in the back of my mind I’ve thought, “I wish he hadn’t been cut.” I have apologized to him numerous times. If I had ever known, I wouldn’t have done this in a million years. I felt as if I might pass out at the sight of my son lying there, unable to move or defend himself. His screams tore at my heart as his foreskin was heartlessly torn from his penis. Too late to turn back, I knew that this was a terrible mistake and that it was something that no one, especially newborn babies, should ever have to endure. A wave of shock coursed through me—my body feeling nauseatingly sick with guilt and shame. All I could think of was holding and consoling my child, but his pain felt inconsolable—his body rigid with fear and anger—his eyes filled with tears of betrayal.

 

[turtle]

12. Jewish Ritual Sacrifice (circumcision)


Some mothers who did not witness the circumcision have since regretted allowing it:

The nurse came to take the baby for the circumcision. I have relived that moment over and over. If I could turn back the hands of time, that would be the one moment I would go back to and say, “I don’t think it’s a good idea. I need another day to think about it” and just hold on to him because I wasn’t sure. I think if I had held on to him it might have turned out differently. I just shouldn’t have let him go when I was so ambivalent. After they took him I went into the shower, and I cried. When they brought him back to me, I could see that he had been crying and had a glassy, wild look in his eyes. I think it was terror. I didn’t know what had been done to him, but I could tell whatever it was, it hurt. I’ll never forget that look. They probably shattered every bit of trust he had. I’m very angry about it. I would never have done that to my own son. No mother would take a knife to her child. When I looked at his penis, I was again instantly sorry that I had allowed it to be done.


(ny post)


"Oral suction circumcisions first came under scrutiny in 2012"

Considering the fact that this "anti-race" religion of condoning and encouraging twisted psychopath pedophile murderers has been kicked out of over 100 countries in the past 2000 years, I highly disagree that their giving vampiric bloody blowjobs to poor little baby boys just now first came under scrutiny in 2012!


Over the past two millennia the Jews as an entire population have been kicked out of over 100 countries for criminal behavior! This is a staggering statistic. No other group of people in world history has ever come close to matching the number of Jewish expulsions. Here’s an abridged version just to give you an idea how long-term and world-wide the Jewish problem really is: “Carthage 250, Alexandria 415, France 554, Visigoth Spain 612, Visigoth Empire 642, Italy 855, Sens 876, Mainz 1012, France 1182, Germany 1182, Upper Bavaria 1276, England 1290, France 1306, France 1322, Switzerland 1348, Hielbronn Germany 1349, Saxony 1349, Hungary 1349, Hungary 1360, Belgium 1370, Slovakia 1380, Strasbourg 1388, Germany 1394, France 1394, Lyons 1420, Austria 1421, Fribourg 1424, Zurich 1424, Cologne 1424, Savoy 1432, Mainz 1438, Augsburg 1439, Netherlands 1442, Netherlands 1444, Bavaria 1446, France 1453, Breslau 1453, Wurzburg 1454, Mainz 1462, Mainz 1483, Warsaw 1484, Vincenza 1485, Spain 1492, Italy 1492, Lithuania 1495, Naples 1496, Portugal 1496, Nuremberg 1498, Navarre 1498, Brandenberg 1510, Prussia 1510, Strasbourg 1514, Genoa 1515, Regensburg 1519, Naples 1533, Naples 1541, Prague 1542, Genoa 1550, Bavaria 1551, Pesaro 1555, Prague 1557, Austria 1559, Prague 1561, Wurzburg 1567, Papal States 1569, Brandenburg 1571, Netherlands 1582, Hungary 1582, Austria 1593, Cremona, Pavia and Lodi 1597, Frankfort 1614, Worms 1615, Kiev 1619, Ukraine 1648, Poland 1648, Hamburg 1649, Little Russia 1654, Lithuania 1656, Oran 1669, Vienna 1670, Sandomir 1712, Russia 1727, Wurtemburg 1738, Little Russia 1740, Prague 1744, Slovakia 1744, Livonia 1744, Moravia 1745, Kovad 1753, Bordeaux 1761, Warsaw 1775, Alsace 1789, Russia 1804/08, Lbeck and Bremen 1815, Franconia, Swabia, and Bavaria 1815, Bremen 1820, Russian border 1843, Areas in US under General Grant 1862, Romania 1866, Russia 1880s, Moscow 1891, Bavaria 1919, Nazi controlled areas 1938-45, Arab countries 1948.

 

[turtle]

13. Jewish Ritual Sacrifice


The Edict of Expulsion of 1290


A catalogue of recorded history surrounding Jewry under Angevin Kings of England, leading up to the Edict of Expulsion by King Edward I

Geoffrey H. Smith and Arnold S. Leese

Jewish Ritual Murder in England Before 1290


The first known case occurred in 1144; after that, cases cropped up from time to time until the Jews were expelled from the realm by Edward I.

The most famous of these incidents was that of Little St. Hugh of Lincoln in 1255. I record these cases in chronological order; There seems no reason to doubt that many cases of ritual murder have been unsuspected and even undiscovered.

1144, Norwich. A twelve year-old boy was crucified and his side pierced at the Jewish Passover. His body was found in a sack hidden in a tree. A converted Jew, called Theobald of Cambridge, confessed that the Jews took blood every year from a Christian child because they thought that only by so doing could they ever obtain their freedom and return to Palestine; and that it was their custom to draw lots to decide whence the blood was to be supplied; Theobald said that last year the lot fell to Narbonne, but in this year to Norwich. The boy was locally beatified and has ever since been known as St. William. The Sheriff, probably bribed, refused to bring the Jews to trial.

In J. C. Cox’s Norfolk Churches, vol. II, p. 47, as also in the Victoria County History of Norfolk, 1906, vol.. II, is an illustration of an old painted rood-screen depicting the ritual murder of St. William; the screen itself is in Loddon Church, Norfolk, unless the power of Jewish money has had it removed. No-one denies this case as a historical event, but the Jews of course say it was not a ritual murder. The Jew, C. Roth, in his The Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew (1935) says: “Modern enquirers, after careful examination of the facts, have concluded that the child probably lost consciousness in consequence of a cataleptic fit, and was buried prematurely by his relatives.” How these modern enquirers arrived at a conclusion like that after all these years, Mr. Roth does not say; nor is it a compliment to the Church to suggest that its ministers would allow the boy’s death to be celebrated as the martyrdom of a saint without having satisfied themselves that wounds on the body confirmed the crucifixion and piercing of the side. And why the relatives should bury the boy in a sack and then dig it up and hang it in a tree would puzzle even a Jew to explain.

John Foxe’s Acts and Monuments of the Church records this ritual murder, as did the Ballandists and other historians. The Prior, William Turbe, who afterwards became Bishop of Norwich, was the leading light in insisting that the crime was one of Jewish ritual murder; in the Dictionary of National Biography (edited by a Jew!) it is made clear that his career, quite apart from this ritual murder case, is that of a man of great strength of character and moral courage.

1160, Gloucester. The body of a child named Harold was found in the river with the usual wounds of crucifixion. Sometimes wrongly dated 1168. (Recorded in Monumenta Germania Historica, vol. VI (Erfurt Annals); Polychronicon, R. Higdon; Chronicles, R. Grafton, p. 46.)

1181, Bury St. Edmunds. A child called Robert was sacrificed at Passover. The child was buried in the church and its presence there was supposed to cause miracles. (Authority: Rohrbacher, from the Chronicle of Gervase of Canterbury.)

1192, Winchester. A boy crucified. Mentioned in the Jewish Encyclopaedia as being a false charge. Details lacking.

1232, Winchester. Boy crucified. Details lacking. (Mentioned in Hyamson’s History of the Jews in England; also in Annals of Winchester; and conclusively in the Close Roll 16, Henry III, m.8, 26.6.1232.)

 

[turtle]

14. Jewish Ritual Sacrifice


1235, Norwich. In this case, Jews stole a child and hid him with a view to crucifying him. Haydn’s Dictionary of Dates of date 1847, says of this case, “They [the Jews] circumcise and attempt to crucify a child at Norwich; the offenders are condemned in a fine of 20,000 marks.” (Further authority Huillard Breolles, Grande Chronique, III, 86; also Close Roll, 19 Henry III, m.23.)

1244, London. A child’s body found unburied in the cemetery of St. Benedict, with ritual cuts. Buried with great pomp in St. Paul’s. (Authority: Social England, vol. I, p. 407, edited by H. D. Traill.)

1255, Lincoln. A boy called Hugh was kidnapped by the Jews and crucified and tortured in hatred of Jesus Christ. The boy’s mother found the body in a well on the premises of a Jew called Jopin or Copinus. This Jew, promised by the judge his life if he confessed, did so, and 91 Jews were arrested; eventually 18 were hanged for the crime. King Henry III himself personally ordered the juridical investigation of the case five weeks after the discovery of the body, and refused to allow mercy to be shown to the Jew Copinus, who was executed.

Hugh was locally beatified, and his tomb may still be seen in Lincoln Cathedral, but the Jewish Money Power has evidently been at work, for between 1910 and 1930 a notice was fixed above the shrine as follows: “The body of Hugh was given burial in the Cathedral and treated as that of a martyr. When the Minster was repaved, the skeleton of a small child was found beneath the present tombstone. There are many incidents in the story which tend to throw doubt upon it, and the existence of similar stories in England and elsewhere points to their origin in the fanatical hatred of the Jews of the Middle Ages and the common superstition, now wholly discredited, that ritual murder was a factor of Jewish Paschal Rites. Attempts were made as early as the 13th century by the Church to protect the Jews against the hatred of the populace and against this particular accusation.”

At a visit to Lincoln of the Jewish Historical Society, in 1934, the Mayor, Mr. G. Deer, said to them: “That he [St. Hugh] was done to death by Jews for ritual purposes cannot be other than a libel based upon the prejudices and ignorance of an unenlightened age.” The Chancellor on the same occasion said: “It was quite obviously one of the very many cases of slander spread about the Jews from time to time. No doubt, the child died or fell down the well."
Haydn’s Dictionary of Dates (1847 edition) medieval and superstitious when it said of this case “They [the Jews] crucify a child at Lincoln.
Copinus said, “For the death of this child, nearly all the Jews in England had come together and every town had sent deputies to assist in the sacrifice.”

No-one questions the historical facts in this case; but Jews and Judaized Gentiles alike unite in denying the fact of ritual murder.

Hyamson’s History of the Jews in England devotes the whole of Chapter IX to “Little St. Hugh of Lincoln,” showing the importance of the ritual murder issue in the Jewish mind today. (The following Close Rolls of the Realm refer to the case of St. Hugh: Henry III, 39, m.2, 7.10.1255; 39, m.2, 14.10.1255; 40, m.20, 24.11.1255; 40, m.13, 13.3.1256; 42, m.6, 19.6.1258. And the Patent Rolls, Henry III, 40, m.20, 26.11.1255; 40, m.19, 9.12.1255; 40, 27.3.1256; and 40, m.5, 20.8.1256.)

1257, London. A child sacrificed. (Authority: Cluverius, Epitome Historiae p. 541.) Details lacking.

1276, London. Boy crucified. (Authority: The Close Roll of the Realm, 4, Edward I, m.14, 3.3.1276.)

1279, Northampton. A child crucified. Haydn’s Dictionary of Dates, 1847, says of this case: “They [the Jews] crucify a child at Northampton for which fifty are drawn at horses’ tails and hanged.” (Further authorities: Reiley, Memorials of London, p. 15; H. Desportes, Le Mystére du Sang.)

 

[turtle]

15. Jewish Ritual Sacrifice


1290, Oxford. The Patent Roll 18 Edward I, m.21, 21st June 1290, contains an order for the gaol delivery of a Jew, Isaac de Pulet, detained for the murder of a Christian boy at Oxford.

Only one month after this, King Edward issued his decree expelling the Jews from the Kingdom. There is, then, every reason to believe that it was the Oxford murder which proved the last straw in toleration.

A similar ritual case was one of the main stimulants to the King and Queen of Spain to expel professing Jews from that country in 1492 (Leese: Jewish Ritual Murder, p. 20).

A significant fact is that Haydn’s Dictionary of Dates, at least up to 1847, quoted the ritual murders in Norman and Plantagenet England as undisputed facts. In later editions in the sixties, all mention of them is extirpated! We may take it that the Jewish Money Power began to dictate to the Press in England somewhere in the fifties of the last century.





Mendel Beilis Case

"Ubistvo Andrushee Youshchinskago" (The Murder of Andrei Youshchinsky)a massive 519-page book written by the prosecuting attorney (and Russian State Duma member at the time), G.G. Zamyslovsky, in the Beilis case.




Shortly before World War I, the Russian Empire was shaken by the bestial murder of Andrei Yushchinsky,
a 13-year-old boy, whose exsanguinated body, bearing all the traces of a Jewish ritual murder,
was found in March 1911 on the outskirts of Kiev.

The ensuing trial, held in the autumn of 1913, attracted wide attention not only in Russia, but also in Europe and even in
the USA.

A Jew named Menahem Mendel Beilis was the only defendant.

The trial of Mendel Beilis—a Jewish factory manager in Kiev, Ukraine, accused of murdering a Christian child to use his blood to bake matzah for Passover.

On March 12, 1911 (under the old Russian calendar), the 13-year-old Ukrainian boy Andrei Yushchinsky disappeared on his way to school.
Eight days later his mutilated body was discovered in a cave near the Zaitsev brick factory.

Beilis was arrested on July 21, 1911, after a lamplighter testified that the boy had been kidnapped by a Jew.


The murder of Andryusha Yushchinsky also took place few day before the Jewish Passover,
his body was also exsanguinated and thrown off without burial.

 

[turtle]

16. Jewish Ritual Sacrifice

RITUAL MURDER AT PASSOVER

Ritual murder at the time of Passover is similar in certain respects to the Purim feast.
The Purim feast commemorates the day of the Persian murders, while the Passover commemorates the day when Christ was murdered.
At the Purim feast the Jews murder an adult Gentile as a replacement for Haman,
while at Passover they murder an innocent Gentile child as a replacement for Christ.
Purim murder is usually a plain and simple butchering, but, on the other hand, the Passover murder is usually a tortuous death.
In both cases, however, the object is to obtain blood, which is used for ritual purposes.

Beilis belonged to the  Lubavitch Hasidic branch of Judaism .
----------------------

A post-mortem examination revealed upon victimes  body 47 wounds, all having evidently been inflicted with an awl or chisel-like instrument and with every indication of system, in order to draw the greatest amount of blood.
The wounds were mostly grouped around the head and neck … while two entering the heart had evidently been given to quickly cause death.

Police investigators examined the corpse at the scene and noticed some strange facts: Despite the child being found dead in the cave, there was little blood there, certainly not explaining the child’s near total blood loss. The child’s shirt appeared to have been pulled up while being stabbed, with the blood pouring out somewhere else, helping to explain why there hadn’t been more blood on the shirt than there was.




The wounds were in a bizarre pattern, not just in one area, but focused in three primary areas: The forehead, the back, and around the heart, with a few wounds scattered around the neck and some even under the armpit.

Other disturbing facts began to appear. Despite no cloths around Andrei, the coroner noticed that Andrei’s mouth had been wrapped with cloth so tight that his teeth left imprints on the inside of his lips. Also, it appeared that his limbs had been securely tied down too, with imprints of ropes left on his arms and legs. Some of the wounds on Andrei’s forehead appeared to have a methodical placement, as if the awl was held in place right on the temple in certain places then extreme force was applied to puncture his skull, explaining why some puncture marks seemed more pronounced and deeper than others.

Investigators looking further into this matter noticed that the boy had been dragged to the cave,while finding occasional drops of blood on the ground and on a nearby recently broken fence, the police discovered that the boy had dragged from a nearby brick factory, which was owned by a Jew, managed by a Jewish man (Beilis), and employed only Jewish workers.

Police quickly interviewed the boy’s playmates. It was discovered that Andrei had been playing with (Zhenya) Eugene Cheberiak, his sisters Valentina and Ludmilla, and another child, Kaliujny.

The children told police that they had been playing with Andrei near the Jewish factory when some Jews came running after them.
They said that one Jew, who had a beard and black hat, caught Andrei and took him away, while Eugene and Kaliujny ran off, frightened by the ordeal.

Inside the factory, there was a secret synagogue.

Investigators were planning to look at one area of the facility; and, the day before they planned to examine the area, it mysteriously caught fire and burnt down.

After interviewing local townspeople, it was discovered that many ultra-orthodox Jews of the Lubavitcher sect—the kind who all have beards, wear black hats, and have long, curly sideburns—had recently congregated at the factory for unknown reasons.
Beilis was arrested, believed to have been involved in the crime.

Eyewitnesses Eugene, Valentina, Ludmilla, and Kaliujny identified Beilis as Andrei’s abductor, with Eugene having stayed longer in hiding than the others.

 

[turtle]

17. Jewish Ritual Sacrifice

Jews of the world suddenly united to free Beilis.

The newspapers owned by Jews all clamored how he must be innocent, and that the case was nothing but mere anti-Semitism. They said because he was Jewish, he could not have committed a crime.

A defense team, with the finest Jewish attorneys in Russia hired.

It has been estimated that in today’s dollars, the equivalent of at least $115 million was raised for Beilis’s defense.

Four members of the defense team. From left to right; Dmitry Grigorovich-Barsky, one of the most prominent attorneys in Kiev; Nikolay Karabchevsky, chairman of the St. Petersburg Council of Barristers; Oscar Gruzenberg, nominal leader of the defense ; and Alexander Zarudny, a prominent liberal lawyer and politician who served as Minister of Justice in the Provisional Government of 1917.


A stack of Jewish religious books entered as evidence by the defense


-------------------------------

It appears that an idea was hatched. It was a dastardly idea, but what seems to be the atypical three-part ploy that usually accompanies a Jewish Ritual Murder that is uncovered: Get rid of the evidence against the Jews; accuse a non-Jew; and, of course, use the media to convince the public.

Lord Rothschild himself even got into the fray. He sent off a letter to Cardinal Merry Del Val of the Roman Catholic church, beginning it with cries of innocence: “Probably Your Excellency is not unaware that in the city of Kiev in the Russian Empire, some ill disposed people have recently renewed the atrocious ritual murder libel against Israelites.”

He asked for the Cardinal to verify the authenticity of a letter by Fr. Ganganelli, who later became Pope Clement XIV.
While the Cardinal did verify the authenticity of the letter, he in no way attributed the meaning to the letter that Rothschild conveyed.
(The letter simply said that Jews should not be punished for ritually murdering Christians without first having been tried for such accusations in court.)

The Jewish defense decided to blame Vera Cheberiak for young Andrei Youshchinsky’s death.

Some Jews even offered her the equivalent of several million dollars today if she would say she was guilty, and provide her free defense, which she obviously refused.
The Jews probably chose her because Vera’s son was the last one playing with Andrei.

The proceedings against Beilis were started. Eugene Cheberiak was scheduled to testify against Beilis.
He had been with his good friend Andrei Youshchinsky on the fateful day that Andrei was abducted and later murdered in cold blood.
Eugene’s sisters, Valentina and Ludmilla, were also there when Andrei was abducted and were to testify.

Eugene Cheberiak, the playmate of Andrei Youshchinsky, was poisoned and died in Kiev. . . .
The elimination of important witnesses is the usual means employed by this bloodthirsty race [of Jews]. . . .
Now there is a new victim in Kiev. The daughter of Cheberiak  Valentina was poisoned.

It is evident that the Jews decided to kill all those who might say a single word about the kidnapping of Andrei Youshchinsky by Beilis. . . Another most important witness has disappeared who could have given testimony in the case of Youshchinsky harmful to the interests of the Jews.
Two of the children who were eye-witnesses, Eugene and Valentina, Cheberiak’s children, had died a few days after Beilis’s imprisonment.

Secret Agent Kozachenko and the criminal Kulinich, both of whom had told investigators of Beilis’s confessions while in jail with him, just disappeared into thin air. The prosecutor “was not able” to find either of them.

 

[turtle]

18. Jewish Ritual Sacrifice

Despite all the mysterious deaths and disappearances surrounding Vera Cheberiak
—the deaths of her two children, Eugene and Valentina;
the murder of her child’s friend, Andrei Youshchinsky;
the supposed suicide of her brother’s friend, Latysheff;
the untimely death of an investigating professor, Professor Obolonsky;
the disappearance of two witnesses who had heard Beilis confess his guilt, Secret Agent Kozachenko and the criminal Kulinich, who were planning to testify—
the good Vera Cheberiak, undaunted by the tragic events surrounding this murder, continued forward and testified at the trial.


She told the defense that her son Eugene had personally seen Beilis grab the innocent child Youshchinsky and took him away, and that Eugene had told her this.

Her daughter Ludmilla also testified, undeterred by her brother and sister’s deaths.

Ludmilla Cheberiak testified:
“The manager of the [brick] factory, Mendel [Beilis], began chasing us, just as some other Jews there pursued us. We started to run away…. We started to get away. However, he [Beilis] caught Eugene and Andrei, but Eugene struggled and escaped, while Andrei could not escape. The Jews then dragged Andrei away."

Vera Cheberiak and daughter Ludmilla


On October 28/10 November, after the trial had lasted a month, the jury gave its verdict ‘that a certain boy found cruelly murdered in Kiev had been killed by fanatical Jews and that Jews, for occult purposes, had carefully drawn all blood from the dying child; that it was an instance of Jewish ritualistic murder; that Beilis was not guilty.

Beilis was found innocent. While 6 of the jurors found him guilty, 6 also believed that he was innocent, with a simple majority being necessary for a conviction. Or, perhaps, some of the jurors were offered—and took—bribes, given the bribe that was offered to Cheberiak and all the other crimes that were committed to free Beilis.

After the Jewish Bolshevik revolution, the Jew-controlled Cheka shot the Judge [Boldirev],
the Public Prosecutor and many of the witnesses, including Father Pranaitis, the medical expert Kozoratov, and Professor Sikorski.

Professor Pawlow, a Jew, who was a witness for the defense, became a leading scientist in Bolshevik Russia!

After the Revolution of 1917, the Provisional Russian Government immediately set about the task of prosecuting former Czarist ministers for crimes against the Russian people.

The Beilis case was the first case submitted for investigation.
In the summer of 1919, although the archives of the Czar had not yet been researched and the commission was only allowed to investigate illegal acts done in an official capacity, the Moscow Revolutionary Tribunal convicted Minister of Justice Shtchedlovitoff, Ministers of the Interior Makaroff and Maklakoff and Director of Police Bielezky. They were all executed. Zamislovsky and Shmakoff died in the interim.

Prosecutor Viper had died awaiting trial following his indictment in 1919.

Vera Cheberiak was shot in Kiev in 1918!

Russian poet V.V. Rozanov wrote about the case in his book, “The Relation of Jews to Blood,” and described the Jewish occult-meanings of the puncture marks that Andrei received.
V.V. Rozanov, who is still a respected poet in Russia, was also killed. His book, “The Relation of Jews to Blood,” had nearly all copies having been rounded up and destroyed.